This week, we revisited the work of Howard Gardner and his principle of multiple intelligences. It helps remind me that I should not cater to just one or two intelligence types. I should do my best to incorporate all seven types of intelligence. The reasons for this are important. First, no one learns everything. Second, not all people learn the same way. Third, not all people have the same interests and abilities. A learner-centered approach, then, is taking into account your students first and foremost in the teaching process. I think this is the way to go. In my discussion posts, I did talk about having a balance, though. Learner-centered does not mean making your classroom a fully democratic environment. The teacher is still in charge. But allowing students a good degree of control over their learning is essential to motivation and trust. Learner-centered does not mean lowering the standard either. I’m a firm believer in keeping the bar high and helping students work toward it.
American psychologist Carl Rogers believed that people should learn because they want to learn. He believed in a therapeutic approach that takes into account a child’s mental and emotional health. Ways to incorporate this include building a climate of trust, participatory decision making, motivation through discovery, and teacher as facilitator of learning.
A final major take-away point for me this week is the idea of subject matter as a tool to explore values and decisions. This ties into my Moral Issues in Education class. This helps me frame the units and content of my curriculum by thinking of the values and decisions that are present in each area of study.